Advanced Search for Maps

Showing 1-10 of 141

Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
24-h averages of SO2 concentration over Auckland in Domain 4, from 0–100 m above ground level at a 500-m resolution
Figure 8 in: Brody-Heine, S., Katurji, M., Stewart, C., Wilson, T., Smid, E. R., & Trancoso, R. (2024). Modeling SO2 dispersion from future eruptions in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 13(1), 1-18.

Okataina, New Zealand
Official, Figure in hazard assessment
A map of the possible distribution of a future rhyolite pyroclastic fall deposit from the Okataina Centre, based on past eruption deposits
Figure 11 in: Nairn, I.A. (1993). Volcanic hazards at Okataina Centre. 3rd ed. Ministry of Civil Defence, Palmerston North, NZ. Volcanic hazards information series 2. 29 p. Reproduced on website: https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Learning/Science-Topics/Volcanoes/New-Zealand-Volcanoes/Volcano-Geology-and-Hazards/Okataina-Volcanic-Centre-Geology

Ruapehu, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
Absolute probability for areas to be affected by a ballistic impact density >0.001
Figure 12 in: Strehlow, K., Sandri, L., Gottsmann, J. H., Kilgour, G., Rust, A. C., & Tonini, R. (2017). Phreatic eruptions at crater lakes: occurrence statistics and probabilistic hazard forecast. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-016-0053-2

Taranaki, New Zealand
Official, Figure in a journal article
An example of a volcanic hazard map for Mount Taranaki
Figure 2 in: Becker, J.S., Saunders, W.S.A., Robertson, C.M., Leonard, G.S., & Johnston, D.M. (2010). A synthesis of challenges and opportunities for reducing volcanic risk through land use planning in New Zealand. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2010-1. (Simplified from: Taranaki Regional Council 2004)

Ruapehu, New Zealand
Official, Sign or billboard
Area closed. Do not enter. Increased risk of eruption.
Department of Conservation. (2020). Area closed. Do not enter. Increased risk of eruption. December 2020 R183230.

New Zealand (regional), New Zealand
Official, Figure in a journal article
Ash thickness (in metres) from our model for 1 Ma of eruptions from Taupo and Okataina centres
Figure 9 in: Hurst, T. & Smith, W. (2010). Volcanic ashfall in New Zealand–probabilistic hazard modelling for multiple sources. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 53(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288301003631129

Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand
Official, Interactive web-based map
Auckland's Hazard Viewer Volcanic Activity
Auckland Council. Auckland's Hazard Viewer: Volcanic Activity.

Tongariro, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
Ballistic vulnerability or probability of casualty assuming an eruption during the time of exposure, along the Tongariro Alpine Crossing
Figure 12 in: Fitzgerald, R. H., Tsunematsu, K., Kennedy, B. M., Breard, E. C. P., Lube, G., Wilson, T. M., Jolly, A.D., Pawson, J., Rosenburg, M.D., & Cronin, S. J. (2014). The application of a calibrated 3D ballistic trajectory model to ballistic hazard assessments at Upper Te Maari, Tongariro. Journal of volcanology and geothermal research, 286, p. 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.04.006

Okataina, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
BET_VH Node 8 maps showing the average absolute probability of accumulating ≥10 km m−2 of tephra in the next 1 year from a single Plinian phase resulting from a a basaltic eruption from within the OVC, b a rhyolitic eruption from within the OVC and c either a basaltic or rhyolitic eruption from within the OVC
Figure 7 in: Thompson, M. A., Lindsay, J. M., Sandri, L., Biass, S., Bonadonna, C., Jolly, G., & Marzocchi, W. (2015). Exploring the influence of vent location and eruption style on tephra fall hazard from the Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. Bulletin of volcanology, 77(5), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0926-y

Tarawera, Haroharo, Ruawahia (Okataina), New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
BET_VH Node 8 maps showing the average conditional probability of accumulating ≥10 kg m−2 tephra given a single Plinian phase resulting from a a basaltic eruption from within the Tarawera LVZ; b a rhyolitic eruption from within the Tarawera LVZ; d a basaltic eruption from within the Haroharo LVZ; e a rhyolitic eruption from within the Haroharo LVZ; e a basaltic eruption from Ruawahia Dome, a single vent within the Tarawera LVZ (see star in Fig. 4); and f a rhyolitic eruption from Ruawahia Dome
Figure 8 in: Thompson, M. A., Lindsay, J. M., Sandri, L., Biass, S., Bonadonna, C., Jolly, G., & Marzocchi, W. (2015). Exploring the influence of vent location and eruption style on tephra fall hazard from the Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. Bulletin of volcanology, 77(5), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0926-y

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   >   >>