Advanced Search for Maps

Showing 11-20 of 141

Tarawera (Okataina), New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
BET_VH Node 8 outputs showing the average absolute probability of accumulating ≥10 kg m−2 of tephra in the next 1 year from a single Plinian phase resulting from a a basaltic eruption and b a rhyolitic eruption, from somewhere within the Tarawera LVZ
Figure 5 in: Thompson, M. A., Lindsay, J. M., Sandri, L., Biass, S., Bonadonna, C., Jolly, G., & Marzocchi, W. (2015). Exploring the influence of vent location and eruption style on tephra fall hazard from the Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. Bulletin of volcanology, 77(5), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0926-y

Cameroon, Cameroon
Figure in a journal article
Classification of areas at Mt. Cameroon in terms of the expected impact on roads associated with vent opening in the area
Figure 12 in: Favalli, M., Tarquini, S., Papale, P., Fornaciai, A., & Boschi, E. (2012). Lava flow hazard and risk at Mt. Cameroon volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology, 74(2), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0540-6

Cameroon, Cameroon
Figure in a journal article
Classification of areas at Mt. Cameroon in terms of the expected impact on towns and villages associated with vent opening in the area
Figure 11 in: Favalli, M., Tarquini, S., Papale, P., Fornaciai, A., & Boschi, E. (2012). Lava flow hazard and risk at Mt. Cameroon volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology, 74(2), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0540-6

Cameroon, Cameroon
Figure in a journal article
Classification of areas in which venting would pose a threat to the towns of Limbe and Buea
Figure 13 in: Favalli, M., Tarquini, S., Papale, P., Fornaciai, A., & Boschi, E. (2012). Lava flow hazard and risk at Mt. Cameroon volcano. Bulletin of Volcanology, 74(2), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0540-6

Taranaki, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
Count of ballistic particle impacts per 10,000 ballistic particles with a diameter of 256 mm
Figure 8 in: Mead, S., Procter, J., Bebbington, M., & Rodriguez-Gomez, C. (2022). Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand). Frontiers in Earth Science, 435. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.832531

Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand
Figure in a journal article
Daily average concentrations of sulfate aerosol over Auckland in Domain 4, from 0–100 m above ground level at a 500-m resolution
Figure 9 in: Brody-Heine, S., Katurji, M., Stewart, C., Wilson, T., Smid, E. R., & Trancoso, R. (2024). Modeling SO2 dispersion from future eruptions in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 13(1), 1-18.

Ruapehu, New Zealand
Official, Sign or billboard
Eruption Hazards at Mt. Ruapehu
GNS Science (compiler). (2007). Eruption Hazards at Mt. Ruapehu. 8 October 2007.

Ruapehu, New Zealand
Official, Sign or billboard
Eruption Hazards at Mt. Ruapehu
GNS Science (compiler). (2008). Eruption Hazards at Mt. Ruapehu.

Tongariro, New Zealand
Official, Map sheet or poster
Eruption Hazards at North Tongariro
GNS Science (compiler). (2012). Te Maari Eruption Phenomena. Version 0.1, 6 August 2012. (Reprinted in: Leonard, G. S., Stewart, C., Wilson, T. M., Procter, J. N., Scott, B. J., Keys, H. J., Jolly, G.E., Wardman, J.B., Cronin. S.J. & McBride, S. K. (2014). Integrating multidisciplinary science, modelling and impact data into evolving, syn-event volcanic hazard mapping and communication: a case study from the 2012 Tongariro eruption crisis, New Zealand. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 286, p. 208-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.018)

Raoul Island, New Zealand
Official, Figure in hazard assessment
Estimated tephra thickness in eruptions at Raoul Island of EVM magnitude 5 to 9
Figure 6 in: Latter, J. H., Lloyd, E. F., Smith, I. E. M., Nathan, S. (1992). Volcanic Hazards in the Kermadec Islands, and at Submarine Volcanoes between Southern Tonga and New Zealand. Volcanic Hazards Information Series No. 4. Volcanic Hazards Working Group of the Scientific Advisory Committee, Ministry of Civil Defence. pp. 44.

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >   >>