Advanced Search for Maps
Showing 1-7 of 7
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure on website
Ashfall model output for Yellowstone supereruption
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2014). Ashfall model output for Yellowstone supereruption. U.S. Geological Survey. Modeling the Ash Distribution of a Yellowstone Supereruption (2014). https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/modeling-ash-distribution-yellowstone-supereruption-2014 (Simplified from: Mastin et al. 2014)
Official, Figure on website
Ashfall model output for Yellowstone supereruption
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2014). Ashfall model output for Yellowstone supereruption. U.S. Geological Survey. Modeling the Ash Distribution of a Yellowstone Supereruption (2014). https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/modeling-ash-distribution-yellowstone-supereruption-2014 (Simplified from: Mastin et al. 2014)
United States (regional); United States (1978)
Official, Map sheet or poster
Preliminary Overview Map of Volcanic Hazards in the 48 Coterminous United States
Mullineaux, D.R. (1978). Preliminary overview map of volcanic hazards in the 48 conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map 786. https://doi.org/10.3133/mf786
Official, Map sheet or poster
Preliminary Overview Map of Volcanic Hazards in the 48 Coterminous United States
Mullineaux, D.R. (1978). Preliminary overview map of volcanic hazards in the 48 conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map 786. https://doi.org/10.3133/mf786
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure in a journal article
Results of simulations with no umbrella cloud: (a) 1 month (January); 1 week(21–27 January); and 3 days (14–16 January
Figure 9 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Results of simulations with no umbrella cloud: (a) 1 month (January); 1 week(21–27 January); and 3 days (14–16 January
Figure 9 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a 3-day-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 14–16 January, (b) 14–16 April, (c) 14–16 July, and(d) 14–16 October.
Figure 8 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a 3-day-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 14–16 January, (b) 14–16 April, (c) 14–16 July, and(d) 14–16 October.
Figure 8 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a month-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) January, (b) April, (c) July, and (d) October.
Figure 6 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a month-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) January, (b) April, (c) July, and (d) October.
Figure 6 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a week-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 21–27 January, (b) 21–27 April, 21–27 July, and(d) 21–27 October.
Figure 7 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a week-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 21–27 January, (b) 21–27 April, 21–27 July, and(d) 21–27 October.
Figure 7 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone; United States (2014)
Official, Figure in a journal article
Tephra fall thickness for simulations from 21 to 27 April, using (a) a 15 km umbrella-cloud height, (b) a 35 km umbrella-cloud height, (c) grain-size distribution GSD2, and(d) grain-size distribution GSD3.
Figure 11 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Tephra fall thickness for simulations from 21 to 27 April, using (a) a 15 km umbrella-cloud height, (b) a 35 km umbrella-cloud height, (c) grain-size distribution GSD2, and(d) grain-size distribution GSD3.
Figure 11 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469