Advanced Search for Maps
Showing 31-39 of 39
Poás, Costa Rica
Official, Figure in hazard assessment
Simulaciones de depósitos de tefra hecha con Ash3d.
(Simulations of tephra deposits made with Ash3d.)
Alvarado, G.E. & Vargas, A. (2018). Plantas Hidroeléctricas Toro 1, 2 y 3: Actualización de la amenaza volcánica del Poás. 120 p. Área de Amenazas y Auscultación Sismológica y Volcánica, ICE [Inf. Interno]. Reprinted in: Alvarado, G.E., Esquivel, L., Sánchez, B.E., & Alfaro, J.C. (2020). Actualización del Peligro Volcánico del Poás, Costa Rica. Comisión Nacional de Prevención de Riesgos y Atención de Emergencias (CNE). Febrero 2020.
Official, Figure in hazard assessment
Simulaciones de depósitos de tefra hecha con Ash3d.
(Simulations of tephra deposits made with Ash3d.)
Alvarado, G.E. & Vargas, A. (2018). Plantas Hidroeléctricas Toro 1, 2 y 3: Actualización de la amenaza volcánica del Poás. 120 p. Área de Amenazas y Auscultación Sismológica y Volcánica, ICE [Inf. Interno]. Reprinted in: Alvarado, G.E., Esquivel, L., Sánchez, B.E., & Alfaro, J.C. (2020). Actualización del Peligro Volcánico del Poás, Costa Rica. Comisión Nacional de Prevención de Riesgos y Atención de Emergencias (CNE). Febrero 2020.
Yellowstone, United States
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a 3-day-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 14–16 January, (b) 14–16 April, (c) 14–16 July, and(d) 14–16 October.
Figure 8 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a 3-day-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 14–16 January, (b) 14–16 April, (c) 14–16 July, and(d) 14–16 October.
Figure 8 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone, United States
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a month-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) January, (b) April, (c) July, and (d) October.
Figure 6 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a month-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) January, (b) April, (c) July, and (d) October.
Figure 6 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone, United States
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a week-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 21–27 January, (b) 21–27 April, 21–27 July, and(d) 21–27 October.
Figure 7 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Simulated tephra fall thickness resulting from a week-long Yellowstone eruption of 330 km³ using 2001 wind fields for (a) 21–27 January, (b) 21–27 April, 21–27 July, and(d) 21–27 October.
Figure 7 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Yellowstone, United States
Official, Figure in a journal article
Tephra fall thickness for simulations from 21 to 27 April, using (a) a 15 km umbrella-cloud height, (b) a 35 km umbrella-cloud height, (c) grain-size distribution GSD2, and(d) grain-size distribution GSD3.
Figure 11 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Official, Figure in a journal article
Tephra fall thickness for simulations from 21 to 27 April, using (a) a 15 km umbrella-cloud height, (b) a 35 km umbrella-cloud height, (c) grain-size distribution GSD2, and(d) grain-size distribution GSD3.
Figure 11 in: Mastin, L.G., Van Eaton, A.R., & Lowenstern, J.B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(8), 3459-3475. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005469
Guagua Pichincha, Ecuador
Official, Figure in a conference presentation
The New Volcanic Hazard Map of Guagua Pichincha Volcano, Third Edition 2019
Telenchana, E., Córdova, M., Mothes, P., Espín, P., Samaniego, P., Bernard, B., Vallejo, S., & Proaño A. (2019). The new potential volcanic hazard map of Guagua Pichincha Volcano, Third Edition 2019. 8th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG).
Official, Figure in a conference presentation
The New Volcanic Hazard Map of Guagua Pichincha Volcano, Third Edition 2019
Telenchana, E., Córdova, M., Mothes, P., Espín, P., Samaniego, P., Bernard, B., Vallejo, S., & Proaño A. (2019). The new potential volcanic hazard map of Guagua Pichincha Volcano, Third Edition 2019. 8th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG).
Cotopaxi, Ecuador
Official, Interactive web-based map
Volcán Cotopaxi Mapa de Amenaza
(Cotopaxi Volcano Hazard Map)
Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional (IG-EPN). (2019). Volcán Cotopaxi Mapa de Amenaza. Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Mapa Interactivo del Volcán Cotopaxi. https://www.igepn.edu.ec/cotopaxi
Official, Interactive web-based map
Volcán Cotopaxi Mapa de Amenaza
(Cotopaxi Volcano Hazard Map)
Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional (IG-EPN). (2019). Volcán Cotopaxi Mapa de Amenaza. Instituto Geofísico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Mapa Interactivo del Volcán Cotopaxi. https://www.igepn.edu.ec/cotopaxi
Sangay, Ecuador
Official, Map sheet or poster
Volcán Sangay, Peligros Volcánicos Potenciales
(Sangay Volcano, Potential Volcanic Hazards)
Ordóñez, J., Vallejo, S., Bustillos, J., Hall, M., Andrade, D., Hidalgo, S., & Samaniego, P. (2013). Volcán Sangay, Peligros Volcánicos Potenciales. Instituto Geofisico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional (IG-EPN) & Institut de Recherche pour le Développment (IRD). Quito.
Official, Map sheet or poster
Volcán Sangay, Peligros Volcánicos Potenciales
(Sangay Volcano, Potential Volcanic Hazards)
Ordóñez, J., Vallejo, S., Bustillos, J., Hall, M., Andrade, D., Hidalgo, S., & Samaniego, P. (2013). Volcán Sangay, Peligros Volcánicos Potenciales. Instituto Geofisico de la Escuela Politecnica Nacional (IG-EPN) & Institut de Recherche pour le Développment (IRD). Quito.
Rincón de la Vieja, Costa Rica
Figure in a journal article
Volcanic hazard map of Rincón de la Vieja volcano
Figure 10 in: Alpízar, Y., Fernández, M., Ramírez, C., & Arroyo, D. (2019). Hazard Map of Rincón de la Vieja Volcano, Costa Rica: Qualitative Integration of Computer Simulations and Geological Data. Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, 42(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2019_3_474_488
Figure in a journal article
Volcanic hazard map of Rincón de la Vieja volcano
Figure 10 in: Alpízar, Y., Fernández, M., Ramírez, C., & Arroyo, D. (2019). Hazard Map of Rincón de la Vieja Volcano, Costa Rica: Qualitative Integration of Computer Simulations and Geological Data. Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, 42(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2019_3_474_488